Question 1
Which statement about connectivity and latency between availability domains in the same OCI region is correct?
A. Availability domains in a region are not connected to each other, so traffic between them must traverse the public internet
Assumes ADs are network-isolated from each other. They are isolated in terms of shared physical infrastructure, not disconnected — they are interconnected within the region.
B. Availability domains share a single physical power and cooling plant, which is what keeps latency between them low
Contradicts AD isolation. Availability domains specifically do not share power or cooling infrastructure; their low latency comes from the region's interconnect, not shared facilities.
C. Traffic between availability domains has the same latency characteristics as traffic between two separate regions
Equates intra-region and inter-region distance. ADs sit within one geographic area, so inter-AD latency is far lower than latency between distant regions.
D. Availability domains in a region are connected by a low-latency, high-bandwidth network, which makes multi-AD architectures practicalCorrect answer
Availability domains within a region are interconnected by a high-bandwidth, low-latency network, which is what allows a single application to span ADs for high availability.
Explanation
Availability domains within a region are connected to each other by a low-latency, high-bandwidth network, which is precisely what makes it practical to build a fault-tolerant application that spans multiple availability domains. They are not disconnected islands requiring internet transit, and because they sit within one geographic area their mutual latency is much lower than that between separate regions. Their isolation comes from not sharing power, cooling, or internal networking infrastructure — sharing a power plant would defeat the very isolation that makes multi-AD design worthwhile.